enrollment: the server mints the §2.1 bootstrap link, the app consumes it

POST /admin/enroll-tokens now returns the whole link, not just the token:

  echolot://enroll?v=1&u=<control URL>&p=pin-sha256:<b64>&t=<token>

The server is the only party that knows all three parts at once, and the part
an operator gets wrong by hand is the base64 pin — which does not fail loudly,
it just never matches, surfacing days later as an inscrutable TLS error. The
app takes the link from a paste or from an echolot:// deep link (QR scan), and
writes URL, pin and credential together or not at all.

One trap the tests pin: an unencoded "+" in a query string decodes to a space,
so a hand-assembled link arrives with a pin wrong by one character. Base64 has
no spaces, so they are restored — unambiguous, and it cannot damage a correctly
encoded pin.

Also fixes a spec divergence: §2.1 names the field device_credential and the
first implementation shipped "credential". Both are sent now and the client
prefers the spec's; the alias goes once nothing reads it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

echolot-app/core-engine/src/test/kotlin/app/echo_lot/engine/LiveEnrollmentTest.kt

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2026 Echolot contributors
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
+
+package app.echo_lot.engine
+
+import app.echo_lot.protocol.EnrollmentLink
+import kotlin.test.Test
+import kotlin.test.assertEquals
+import kotlin.test.assertNotNull
+import kotlin.test.assertTrue
+import kotlin.test.fail
+
+/**
+ * Enrolls against a LIVE server using the link the server itself minted (probe-protocol.md §2.1).
+ *
+ * This is the test that matters for enrollment, because the failure mode it guards against is a
+ * *disagreement* between two programs: the Go side assembles the link, the Kotlin side takes it
+ * apart, and if they differ by one percent-encoding the pin is wrong by one character — which
+ * does not fail loudly, it fails as an inscrutable TLS error days later. A unit test on either
+ * side alone cannot see that.
+ *
+ * Needs ECHOLOT_ENROLL_URI (minted over SSH by scripts/test-fmr.sh); self-skips without it.
+ */
+class LiveEnrollmentTest {
+
+    private val enrollUri = System.getenv("ECHOLOT_ENROLL_URI")
+
+    @Test
+    fun enrollsFromTheServersOwnLink() {
+        if (enrollUri.isNullOrBlank()) {
+            println("LiveEnrollmentTest skipped (no ECHOLOT_ENROLL_URI)"); return
+        }
+        println("link: ${enrollUri.take(60)}…")
+
+        val link = assertNotNull(
+            EnrollmentLink.parse(enrollUri),
+            "the client could not parse a link the server produced — the two sides disagree",
+        )
+        println("parsed: url=${link.controlUrl} pin=${link.pin.take(12)}… token=${link.token.take(8)}…")
+
+        // Redeeming applies the pin to the very request that spends the token, so a wrong pin
+        // fails here at the handshake rather than after the token is gone.
+        val enrolled = link.redeem(deviceName = "live-test", appVersion = "0.2.0")
+        assertTrue(enrolled.credential.isNotBlank(), "no credential came back")
+        assertTrue(enrolled.deviceId.isNotBlank(), "no device id came back")
+        println("enrolled: device=${enrolled.deviceId} server=${enrolled.profile.name} " +
+            "${enrolled.profile.serverVersion}")
+
+        // The credential must actually work, and the pin from the link must be the one that
+        // verifies the server — that is the whole claim the link is making.
+        assertEquals(link.controlUrl, enrolled.controlUrl)
+        assertTrue(enrolled.profile.capabilities.contains("udp-probe"),
+            "profile fetched with the new credential looks wrong: ${enrolled.profile.capabilities}")
+
+        // Single-use: a token that still works after redemption is a token an attacker can reuse.
+        try {
+            link.redeem(deviceName = "should-not-happen", appVersion = "0.2.0")
+            fail("the enrollment token was accepted twice — it must be single-use")
+        } catch (t: Throwable) {
+            println("second redemption correctly refused: ${t.message?.take(120)}")
+        }
+    }
+}