mrambossekandClaude Opus 5
30d9501507
The scheme was already registered and the deep link already worked — it enrolled on arrival, with no confirmation. Now that the web UI offers the link as something to follow, that is one tap between a working enrollment and a replaced one, from a page that might be showing a link minted for a different device entirely. Enrolling is not additive: the new credential replaces the old, and on the previous server this device simply stops reporting. So the link is held and the user is asked, with both server URLs named — the question is "which server", and it cannot be answered without seeing both. The dialog says what survives, because that is the part someone hesitates over: uploads already on the old server stay there, runs stored on the phone are untouched, and the device reappears on the new server as a new device rather than carrying its history across. Enrolling also clears the cached canary zone. It describes the old server's deployment, and querying it against the new one would measure somebody else's zone and file the answer under this network. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Echolot
Free software for detecting and debugging local network issues from an Android phone — built for people who actually know what a neighbor table is.
Most "wifi analyzer" apps show you signal bars. Echolot aims at the layer where home and office networks actually break: duplicate DHCP servers, broken IPv6 RAs, MTU black holes, NAT64 weirdness, multicast that dies at the AP, DNS that answers differently than it should. It records what it observed, separates observation from interpretation, and exports the whole run so you can argue with it later.
Status: pre-release. The capability prober runs on real hardware; the production app and the probe server are not built yet.
Repository layout
docs/ design docs — the contract for everything below
echolot-prober/ capability prober: validates the no-root feasibility matrix on real devices
The Go probe server and the production app land here as siblings.
Design docs
The three specs are draft-complete and reviewed; treat them as the contract.
| Doc | What it defines |
|---|---|
| docs/feature-catalog-and-feasibility.md | Full feature list + the no-root feasibility matrix |
| docs/measurement-schema.md | Archived/exportable measurement JSON (observation vs finding, two-clock rule, anonymization) |
| docs/probe-protocol.md | Client↔server wire protocol (pinned TLS control plane, binary UDP data plane, STUN, canary DNS) |
| docs/build-status.md | Running log of decisions and next steps |
Privilege tiers
Every result records which tier produced it:
app— no root, no special setup. The bulk of the functionality.shizuku— ADB-shell privileges via wireless pairing, no root. Shipped in v1.root— future optional module.
Licensing
| Part | License | Why |
|---|---|---|
| All code (app, prober, server) | GPL-3.0-or-later | The value here is the platform-API research; copyleft keeps derivative apps free |
docs/ (the specs) |
CC-BY-4.0 | A wire protocol and a measurement format should be implementable by anyone, without license anxiety |
Full texts: LICENSE (GPLv3) and docs/LICENSE (CC BY 4.0).
Sources carry SPDX-License-Identifier headers.
If you want to build a compatible server or client, the protocol and schema docs are deliberately permissive — go ahead.
Building
See echolot-prober/README.md. Short version, from echolot-prober/:
echo "sdk.dir=/path/to/Android/sdk" > local.properties
./gradlew :app:assembleDebug